Any time I'm having trouble getting actual work done, I like to barge in on other people and make it harder for them to work too. That's why I was over at Rerouted River National Laboratory the other day, hanging out in the office of somebody who insists that I refer to him as "Dr. N." This used to be his way of keeping me from jeopardizing his job by writing about what he actually says, but now he's also a big-time blogger, with scads of Twitter groupies who know him only as "Dr. N." So now, if I were to point out that his real name is Barlow Culbertson and he never got a doctorate, it probably wouldn't create a ripple in the blogosphere; he's much too cool as "Dr. N" for his first-life persona to matter to anyone.

The nation's nuclear energy bloggers have their say about what to do with used fuel

On May 13, the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future released its draft conclusions and recommendations. Despite its more general sounding title, the commission's work mostly concerned the nuclear waste issue. It was created by President Obama's administration primarily to investigate alternatives to the proposed Yucca Mountain repository, after the administration moved to shut that program down. While the commission did release some recommendations on other issues such as advanced reactors and Fukishima, this post will focus on its recommendations concerning nuclear waste policy.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on March 22, 2011, for the lawsuit brought by three private citizens of Washington State challenging the president's authority to cancel the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository.